Demographics details for Thornton, CO vs Mc henry, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CO vs Mc henry, MS.
| Data | Thornton | Mc henry |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 143,282 | 183 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $95,064 | $49,000 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 68.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Mc henry
- In Thornton, the population is higher at 143,282, compared to 183 in Mc henry.
- The median age in Mc henry is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064 compared to $49,000 in Mc henry.
- In Mc henry, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.0%, compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is higher in Mc henry at 15%, compared to 9% in Thornton.
- Mc henry has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Mc henry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Mc henry |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 20 |
| White | 39 | 70 |
| Asian | 6 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Mc henry
- In Mc henry, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc henry at 70% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 6% compared to 5% in Mc henry.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 37% compared to 3% in Mc henry.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 15% compared to 2% in Mc henry.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Thornton at 1% compared to 0% in Mc henry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Mc henry |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Mc henry
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thornton at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thornton at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thornton at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thornton at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Mc henry |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (2,448) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (18,983) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (20,999) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,712) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Mc henry
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.