Demographics details for Thornton, CO vs Kendall park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CO vs Kendall park, NJ.
| Data | Thornton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 143,282 | 10,624 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $95,064 | $159,362 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Kendall park
- In Thornton, the population is higher at 143,282, compared to 10,624 in Kendall park.
- The median age in Kendall park is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Kendall park has a higher median income of $159,362, compared to $95,064 in Thornton.
- In Kendall park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 2% in Kendall park.
- The unemployment rate in Thornton is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Kendall park.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Kendall park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 39 | 46 |
| Asian | 6 | 31 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Kendall park
- In Kendall park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kendall park at 46% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- In Kendall park, the Asian population stands at 31%, greater than 6% in Thornton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 37% compared to 14% in Kendall park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 15% compared to 6% in Kendall park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Thornton at 1% compared to 0% in Kendall park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 25.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Kendall park
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.5% in Kendall park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thornton at 22.0% compared to 17.6% in Kendall park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thornton at 15.1% compared to 8.6% in Kendall park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Kendall park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thornton at 30.1% compared to 25.1% in Kendall park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kendall park at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Kendall park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (2,448) | 0.2% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (18,983) | 11.8% (1,256) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (20,999) | 9.3% (992) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,712) | 38.1% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Kendall park
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Kendall park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 11.8% in Kendall park.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 9.3% in Kendall park.
- In Kendall park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.