Demographics details for Thornton, CO vs Green, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CO vs Green, OH.
| Data | Thornton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 143,282 | 27,269 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,064 | $90,419 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Green
- In Thornton, the population is higher at 143,282, compared to 27,269 in Green.
- The median age in Green is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064 compared to $90,419 in Green.
- In Green, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Green.
- Green has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Green provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 39 | 94 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Green
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thornton at 2% compared to 1% in Green.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Green at 94% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 6% compared to 1% in Green.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 37% compared to 1% in Green.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 15% compared to 3% in Green.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Thornton at 1% compared to 0% in Green.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Green
- In Green, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Green at 24.7% versus 22.0% in Thornton.
- Green has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 19.1% in Green.
- Green has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thornton at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Green.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Green |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (2,448) | 0.2% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (18,983) | 16.6% (4,514) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (20,999) | 3.0% (828) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,712) | 29.3% (7,977) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Green
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Green.
- In Green, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Thornton.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 3.0% in Green.
- In Green, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.