Demographics details for Thornton, CO vs Central city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CO vs Central city, NE.
Data | Thornton | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 143,282 | 3,078 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $95,064 | $54,063 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Central city
- In Thornton, the population is higher at 143,282, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- The median age in Central city is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064 compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Thornton at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is identical in both Thornton and Central city at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Thornton is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Thornton | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 39 | 86 |
Asian | 6 | 3 |
Hispanic | 37 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thornton at 2% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 86% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 6% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 37% compared to 7% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 15% compared to 4% in Central city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Thornton at 1% compared to 0% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Thornton | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.1% |
Depression | 22.0% | 18.6% |
Smoking | 15.1% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 20.0% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 44.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Central city
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thornton at 22.0% compared to 18.6% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Thornton | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (2,448) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (18,983) | 23.4% (721) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (20,999) | 5.8% (178) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,712) | 13.1% (404) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 13.2% in Thornton.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 13.1% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.