Demographics details for Thornton, CO vs Alameda, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CO vs Alameda, CA.
| Data | Thornton | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 143,282 | 76,040 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $95,064 | $129,917 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Alameda
- In Thornton, the population is higher at 143,282, compared to 76,040 in Alameda.
- The median age in Alameda is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Alameda has a higher median income of $129,917, compared to $95,064 in Thornton.
- In Alameda, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Alameda.
- Alameda has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Alameda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 7 |
| White | 39 | 37 |
| Asian | 6 | 32 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Alameda
- In Alameda, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 37% in Alameda.
- In Alameda, the Asian population stands at 32%, greater than 6% in Thornton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 37% compared to 12% in Alameda.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 15% compared to 12% in Alameda.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Thornton at 1% compared to 0% in Alameda.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 23.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Alameda
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.0% in Alameda.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thornton at 22.0% compared to 17.2% in Alameda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thornton at 15.1% compared to 8.9% in Alameda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 15.5% in Alameda.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thornton at 30.1% compared to 23.5% in Alameda.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Thornton and Alameda at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Alameda |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (2,448) | 1.1% (864) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (18,983) | 7.0% (5,348) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (20,999) | 6.8% (5,184) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,712) | 44.5% (33,855) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Alameda
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.1% in Alameda.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 7.0% in Alameda.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 6.8% in Alameda.
- In Alameda, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.5% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.