Demographics details for Thornton, CA vs Surprise, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CA vs Surprise, AZ.
| Data | Thornton | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 873 | 154,198 |
| Median Age | 29.6 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,839 | $87,756 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Surprise
- The population in Surprise is higher at 154,198, compared to 873 in Thornton.
- The median age in Surprise is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 29.6 years in Thornton.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756, compared to $43,839 in Thornton.
- In Surprise, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is higher in Surprise at 13%, compared to 10% in Thornton.
- The unemployment rate in Thornton is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.9% in Surprise.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Surprise provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 6 | 63 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 59 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 24 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Surprise
- In Surprise, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Thornton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Surprise at 63% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 7% compared to 2% in Surprise.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 59% compared to 20% in Surprise.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 24% compared to 9% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Thornton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Surprise
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Surprise.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Surprise at 20.1% versus 19.0% in Thornton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thornton at 17.6% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 14.0% in Thornton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thornton at 39.8% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thornton at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.5% (39) | 0.5% (754) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (169) | 13.7% (21,050) |
| Less than High School | 42.4% (370) | 7.6% (11,792) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.5% (22) | 19.9% (30,735) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Surprise
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 13.7% in Surprise.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 42.4% compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 2.5% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.