Demographics details for Thornton, CA vs Park ridge, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CA vs Park ridge, NJ.
| Data | Thornton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 873 | 9,426 |
| Median Age | 29.6 years | 47.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,839 | $164,241 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Park ridge
- The population in Park ridge is higher at 9,426, compared to 873 in Thornton.
- The median age in Park ridge is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 29.6 years in Thornton.
- Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241, compared to $43,839 in Thornton.
- In Park ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 33.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Park ridge.
- The unemployment rate in Thornton is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.5% in Park ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Park ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thornton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 6 | 77 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 59 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 24 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thornton at 4% compared to 1% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Park ridge at 77% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 7% compared to 4% in Park ridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 59% compared to 13% in Park ridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 24% compared to 5% in Park ridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thornton and Park ridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thornton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Park ridge
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.1% in Park ridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thornton at 19.0% compared to 17.8% in Park ridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thornton at 17.6% compared to 10.2% in Park ridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Park ridge at 18.7% compared to 14.0% in Thornton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thornton at 39.8% compared to 24.6% in Park ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thornton at 18.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thornton | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.5% (39) | 0.3% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (169) | 12.4% (1,169) |
| Less than High School | 42.4% (370) | 5.8% (549) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.5% (22) | 37.8% (3,565) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 12.4% in Park ridge.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 42.4% compared to 5.8% in Park ridge.
- In Park ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.8% compared to 2.5% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.