Demographics details for Thornton, CA vs Marshall, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thornton, CA vs Marshall, MI.
Data | Thornton | Marshall |
---|---|---|
Population | 873 | 6,753 |
Median Age | 29.6 years | 45.4 years |
Median Income | $43,839 | $72,813 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Thornton vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 6,753, compared to 873 in Thornton.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 29.6 years in Thornton.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813, compared to $43,839 in Thornton.
- In Marshall, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Thornton is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.2% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Thornton vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Thornton | Marshall |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 6 | 94 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 59 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 24 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thornton vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thornton at 4% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 94% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Thornton at 7% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thornton at 59% compared to 4% in Marshall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thornton at 24% compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thornton and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Thornton | Marshall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 10.6% |
Depression | 19.0% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 39.8% | 37.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thornton vs Marshall
- More residents in Thornton report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 25.2% versus 19.0% in Thornton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thornton at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Thornton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thornton at 39.8% compared to 37.5% in Marshall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thornton at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Thornton | Marshall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.5% (39) | 0.7% (46) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (169) | 15.8% (1,067) |
Less than High School | 42.4% (370) | 7.3% (493) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.5% (22) | 33.1% (2,233) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thornton vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton have no formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thornton hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- More residents in Thornton have less than a high school education at 42.4% compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 2.5% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.