Demographics details for Thorndale, PA vs Wappingers falls, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Thorndale, PA vs Wappingers falls, NY.

Data Thorndale Wappingers falls
Population 4,007 6,064
Median Age 38.1 years 47.9 years
Median Income $96,667 $61,554
Married Families 47.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Thorndale vs Wappingers falls

  • The population in Wappingers falls is higher at 6,064, compared to 4,007 in Thorndale.
  • The median age in Wappingers falls is higher at 47.9 years, compared to 38.1 years in Thorndale.
  • Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667 compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Thorndale at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • Thorndale has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Thorndale and Wappingers falls at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Thorndale vs Wappingers falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Thorndale Wappingers falls
Black 7 13
White 78 61
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 8 20
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Thorndale vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 7% in Thorndale.
  • Thorndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 61% in Wappingers falls.
  • In Wappingers falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Thorndale.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 8% in Thorndale.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Thorndale at 5% compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thorndale and Wappingers falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Thorndale Wappingers falls
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 11.9%
Depression 21.4% 22.8%
Smoking 13.2% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 16.4%
Obesity 33.1% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Thorndale vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Thorndale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wappingers falls at 22.8% versus 21.4% in Thorndale.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 13.2% in Thorndale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Thorndale at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 33.1% in Thorndale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Thorndale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Thorndale Wappingers falls
No Schooling 0.0% (1) 0.9% (57)
High School Diploma 22.3% (893) 18.1% (1,099)
Less than High School 3.6% (146) 24.9% (1,511)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.9% (1,077) 14.2% (861)

Education Levels Comparison: Thorndale vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Thorndale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 18.1% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wappingers falls at 24.9%, compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 14.2% in Wappingers falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.