Demographics details for Thorndale, PA vs Norton, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thorndale, PA vs Norton, KS.
Data | Thorndale | Norton |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,007 | 5,301 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $96,667 | $52,710 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Thorndale vs Norton
- The population in Norton is higher at 5,301, compared to 4,007 in Thorndale.
- The median age in Norton is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 38.1 years in Thorndale.
- Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667 compared to $52,710 in Norton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Thorndale at 47.0% compared to 37.0% in Norton.
- The poverty level is higher in Norton at 10%, compared to 6% in Thorndale.
- The unemployment rate in Thorndale is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Norton.
Demographics
Demographics Thorndale vs Norton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Thorndale | Norton |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 3 |
White | 78 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Thorndale vs Norton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thorndale at 7% compared to 3% in Norton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norton at 85% compared to 78% in Thorndale.
- The Asian population is larger in Thorndale at 2% compared to 1% in Norton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thorndale at 8% compared to 6% in Norton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thorndale at 5% compared to 4% in Norton.
- In Norton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Thorndale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Thorndale | Norton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 9.9% |
Depression | 21.4% | 20.2% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 33.1% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thorndale vs Norton
- In Norton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.2% in Thorndale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thorndale at 21.4% compared to 20.2% in Norton.
- Norton has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 13.2% in Thorndale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norton at 20.3% compared to 18.8% in Thorndale.
- Norton has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 33.1% in Thorndale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norton at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Thorndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Thorndale | Norton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (893) | 17.6% (934) |
Less than High School | 3.6% (146) | 13.0% (687) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (1,077) | 15.7% (830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thorndale vs Norton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Thorndale and Norton at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Norton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norton at 13.0%, compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 15.7% in Norton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.