Demographics details for Thorndale, PA vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thorndale, PA vs Lancaster, VA.
| Data | Thorndale | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,007 | 10,750 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 59.2 years |
| Median Income | $96,667 | $62,674 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Thorndale vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 10,750, compared to 4,007 in Thorndale.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 38.1 years in Thorndale.
- Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667 compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Thorndale at 47.0% compared to 46.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 6% in Thorndale.
- The unemployment rate in Thorndale is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Thorndale vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thorndale | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 28 |
| White | 78 | 66 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thorndale vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 7% in Thorndale.
- Thorndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Thorndale at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thorndale at 8% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thorndale at 5% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thorndale and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thorndale | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thorndale vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.2% in Thorndale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.2% versus 21.4% in Thorndale.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 13.2% in Thorndale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thorndale at 18.8% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 33.1% in Thorndale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Thorndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thorndale | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (1) | 1.5% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (893) | 20.9% (2,244) |
| Less than High School | 3.6% (146) | 17.0% (1,823) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (1,077) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thorndale vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 20.9% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 17.0%, compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 26.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.