Demographics details for Thorndale, PA vs Harker heights, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Thorndale, PA vs Harker heights, TX.

Data Thorndale Harker heights
Population 4,007 34,102
Median Age 38.1 years 34.5 years
Median Income $96,667 $72,258
Married Families 47.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 6% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Thorndale vs Harker heights

  • The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 4,007 in Thorndale.
  • Residents in Thorndale have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667 compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Thorndale at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Harker heights at 9%, compared to 6% in Thorndale.
  • Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Thorndale.

Demographics

Demographics Thorndale vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Thorndale Harker heights
Black 7 28
White 78 36
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 8 21
Two or More Races 5 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Thorndale vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 7% in Thorndale.
  • Thorndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Thorndale.
  • Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 8% in Thorndale.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 5% in Thorndale.
  • In Harker heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Thorndale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Thorndale Harker heights
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 10.8%
Depression 21.4% 22.5%
Smoking 13.2% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 17.1%
Obesity 33.1% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Thorndale vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Thorndale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 21.4% in Thorndale.
  • Harker heights has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Thorndale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Thorndale at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 33.1% in Thorndale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Thorndale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Thorndale Harker heights
No Schooling 0.0% (1) 1.3% (448)
High School Diploma 22.3% (893) 11.6% (3,958)
Less than High School 3.6% (146) 10.3% (3,509)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.9% (1,077) 18.8% (6,403)

Education Levels Comparison: Thorndale vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Thorndale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harker heights at 10.3%, compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.