Demographics details for Thorndale, PA vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thorndale, PA vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Thorndale | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,007 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $96,667 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Thorndale vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 545,567, compared to 4,007 in Thorndale.
- Residents in Thorndale have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667 compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Thorndale at 47.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 6% in Thorndale.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 3.5% in Thorndale.
Demographics
Demographics Thorndale vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thorndale | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 7 |
| White | 78 | 10 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Thorndale vs Fresno
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Thorndale and Fresno at 7%.
- Thorndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Thorndale.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 8% in Thorndale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 5% in Thorndale.
- In Fresno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Thorndale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thorndale | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thorndale vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.2% in Thorndale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thorndale at 21.4% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Thorndale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thorndale at 18.8% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 33.1% in Thorndale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Thorndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thorndale | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (1) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (893) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 3.6% (146) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (1,077) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thorndale vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.