Demographics details for Thorndale, PA vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thorndale, PA vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Thorndale | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,007 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $96,667 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Thorndale vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 4,007 in Thorndale.
- Residents in Thorndale have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Thorndale at 47.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 6% in Thorndale.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Thorndale.
Demographics
Demographics Thorndale vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thorndale | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 73 |
| White | 78 | 12 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thorndale vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 7% in Thorndale.
- Thorndale has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Thorndale at 2% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Thorndale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Thorndale at 5% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thorndale and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thorndale | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thorndale vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.2% in Thorndale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Thorndale at 21.4% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 13.2% in Thorndale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Thorndale at 18.8% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 33.1% in Thorndale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thorndale at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thorndale | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (1) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (893) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 3.6% (146) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (1,077) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thorndale vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairburn at 5.7%, compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thorndale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.