Demographics details for Thompsons station, TN vs Bee, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Thompsons station, TN vs Bee, NE.

Data Thompsons station Bee
Population 8,199 169
Median Age 36.1 years 35.9 years
Median Income $116,569 $63,750
Married Families 44.0% 68.0%
Poverty Level 3% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 2.5

Population Comparison: Thompsons station vs Bee

  • In Thompsons station, the population is higher at 8,199, compared to 169 in Bee.
  • Residents in Thompsons station have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 35.9 years in Bee.
  • Thompsons station has a higher median income of $116,569 compared to $63,750 in Bee.
  • In Bee, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.0%, compared to 44.0% in Thompsons station.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bee at 5%, compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • The unemployment rate in Thompsons station is higher at 2.6%, compared to 2.5% in Bee.

Demographics

Demographics Thompsons station vs Bee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Thompsons station Bee
Black 2 Data is updating
White 84 99
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Thompsons station vs Bee

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thompsons station at 2% compared to 0% in Bee.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bee at 99% compared to 84% in Thompsons station.
  • The Asian population is larger in Thompsons station at 4% compared to 0% in Bee.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Thompsons station at 1% compared to 0% in Bee.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Thompsons station at 11% compared to 1% in Bee.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thompsons station and Bee at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Thompsons station Bee
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 12.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 8.3%
Depression 24.3% 16.7%
Smoking 13.5% 13.6%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 22.4%
Obesity 29.2% 35.0%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 37.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Thompsons station vs Bee

  • More residents in Thompsons station report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.8% in Bee.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Thompsons station at 24.3% compared to 16.7% in Bee.
  • Bee has a higher smoking rate at 13.6% compared to 13.5% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bee at 22.4% compared to 17.0% in Thompsons station.
  • Bee has higher obesity rates at 35.0% compared to 29.2% in Thompsons station.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bee at 37.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Thompsons station Bee
No Schooling 0.6% (51) 1.2% (2)
High School Diploma 11.2% (920) 26.6% (45)
Less than High School 4.1% (340) 8.3% (14)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.2% (2,725) 10.1% (17)

Education Levels Comparison: Thompsons station vs Bee

  • In Bee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Thompsons station.
  • In Bee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bee at 8.3%, compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Thompsons station hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 10.1% in Bee.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.