Demographics details for Thomasville, GA vs Rogue river, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Thomasville, GA vs Rogue river, OR.

Data Thomasville Rogue river
Population 18,460 2,380
Median Age 36.2 years 52.6 years
Median Income $45,789 $43,929
Married Families 30.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 15% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 4.5

Population Comparison: Thomasville vs Rogue river

  • In Thomasville, the population is higher at 18,460, compared to 2,380 in Rogue river.
  • The median age in Rogue river is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 36.2 years in Thomasville.
  • Thomasville has a higher median income of $45,789 compared to $43,929 in Rogue river.
  • In Rogue river, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 30.0% in Thomasville.
  • Thomasville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Rogue river.
  • Rogue river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Thomasville.

Demographics

Demographics Thomasville vs Rogue river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Thomasville Rogue river
Black 56 Data is updating
White 39 85
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Thomasville vs Rogue river

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thomasville at 56% compared to 0% in Rogue river.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rogue river at 85% compared to 39% in Thomasville.
  • Both Thomasville and Rogue river have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Rogue river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Thomasville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rogue river at 8%, compared to 2% in Thomasville.
  • In Rogue river, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Thomasville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Thomasville Rogue river
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 11.2%
Depression 21.4% 29.2%
Smoking 19.0% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 13.2% 16.9%
Obesity 41.8% 29.6%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Thomasville vs Rogue river

  • In Rogue river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.9% in Thomasville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rogue river at 29.2% versus 21.4% in Thomasville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Thomasville at 19.0% compared to 15.3% in Rogue river.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rogue river at 16.9% compared to 13.2% in Thomasville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Thomasville at 41.8% compared to 29.6% in Rogue river.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rogue river at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Thomasville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Thomasville Rogue river
No Schooling 0.6% (119) 0.7% (17)
High School Diploma 16.1% (2,975) 16.5% (392)
Less than High School 10.3% (1,898) 12.7% (302)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.5% (3,233) 10.1% (240)

Education Levels Comparison: Thomasville vs Rogue river

  • In Rogue river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Thomasville.
  • In Rogue river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 16.1% in Thomasville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rogue river at 12.7%, compared to 10.3% in Thomasville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Thomasville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 10.1% in Rogue river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.