Demographics details for Thomaston, GA vs Cullman, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Thomaston, GA vs Cullman, AL.
| Data | Thomaston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,858 | 19,251 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $30,298 | $59,982 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 28% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Thomaston vs Cullman
- The population in Cullman is higher at 19,251, compared to 9,858 in Thomaston.
- The median age in Cullman is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.7 years in Thomaston.
- Cullman has a higher median income of $59,982, compared to $30,298 in Thomaston.
- In Cullman, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 23.0% in Thomaston.
- Thomaston has a higher poverty level at 28% compared to 12% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Thomaston.
Demographics
Demographics Thomaston vs Cullman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Thomaston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 1 |
| White | 56 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Thomaston vs Cullman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Thomaston at 38% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cullman at 92% compared to 56% in Thomaston.
- Both Thomaston and Cullman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Thomaston at 3% compared to 2% in Cullman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cullman at 4%, compared to 2% in Thomaston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Thomaston and Cullman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Thomaston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Thomaston vs Cullman
- More residents in Thomaston report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Cullman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cullman at 24.9% versus 22.4% in Thomaston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Thomaston at 22.2% compared to 18.2% in Cullman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cullman at 16.4% compared to 13.9% in Thomaston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Thomaston at 39.8% compared to 37.5% in Cullman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Thomaston at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Cullman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Thomaston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (264) | 0.7% (130) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (1,473) | 13.6% (2,614) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (1,308) | 13.0% (2,512) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (1,153) | 22.1% (4,253) |
Education Levels Comparison: Thomaston vs Cullman
- A higher percentage of residents in Thomaston have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Cullman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Thomaston hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 13.6% in Cullman.
- More residents in Thomaston have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 13.0% in Cullman.
- In Cullman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 11.7% in Thomaston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.