Demographics details for Texarkana, TX vs South river, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, TX vs South river, NJ.
| Data | Texarkana | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,778 | 15,990 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,054 | $95,981 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs South river
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 35,778, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981, compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- In South river, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | 7 |
| White | 46 | 50 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs South river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 39% compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South river at 50% compared to 46% in Texarkana.
- In South river, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Texarkana.
- South river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 9% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South river at 7%, compared to 4% in Texarkana.
- In South river, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Texarkana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs South river
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 23.4% compared to 21.0% in South river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 21.5% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Texarkana and South river at 16.0%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 42.0% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Texarkana and South river at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | South river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (324) | 2.5% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (6,286) | 18.7% (2,985) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (4,243) | 20.6% (3,292) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (5,688) | 18.9% (3,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs South river
- In South river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Texarkana.
- In South river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 17.6% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South river at 20.6%, compared to 11.9% in Texarkana.
- In South river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 15.9% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.