Demographics details for Texarkana, TX vs Rockford, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, TX vs Rockford, WA.
Data | Texarkana | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,778 | 565 |
Median Age | 37.2 years | 50.4 years |
Median Income | $48,054 | $68,750 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Rockford
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 35,778, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- The median age in Rockford is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 37.2 years in Texarkana.
- Rockford has a higher median income of $68,750, compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- In Rockford, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Rockford.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Texarkana | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Black | 39 | Data is updating |
White | 46 | 84 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 39% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockford at 84% compared to 46% in Texarkana.
- The Asian population is larger in Texarkana at 2% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Texarkana at 9% compared to 4% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 10%, compared to 4% in Texarkana.
- In Rockford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Texarkana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Texarkana | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.5% |
Depression | 23.4% | 28.8% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 29.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Rockford
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.4% in Rockford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockford at 28.8% versus 23.4% in Texarkana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 21.5% compared to 15.2% in Rockford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 42.0% compared to 29.9% in Rockford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Texarkana | Rockford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (324) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (6,286) | 11.9% (67) |
Less than High School | 11.9% (4,243) | 7.4% (42) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (5,688) | 12.9% (73) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 11.9% in Rockford.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 12.9% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.