Demographics details for Texarkana, TX vs Concord, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, TX vs Concord, NC.
| Data | Texarkana | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,778 | 109,896 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $48,054 | $83,480 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 109,896, compared to 35,778 in Texarkana.
- The median age in Concord is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 37.2 years in Texarkana.
- Concord has a higher median income of $83,480, compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Concord.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | 21 |
| White | 46 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Concord
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 39% compared to 21% in Concord.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Concord at 54% compared to 46% in Texarkana.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Texarkana.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 9% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Concord at 6%, compared to 4% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Texarkana and Concord at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Concord
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in Concord.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Concord at 23.7% versus 23.4% in Texarkana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 42.0% compared to 33.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (324) | 0.8% (838) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (6,286) | 12.6% (13,853) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (4,243) | 9.9% (10,845) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (5,688) | 25.8% (28,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Concord
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 12.6% in Concord.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 9.9% in Concord.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 15.9% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.