Demographics details for Texarkana, TX vs Columbus, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, TX vs Columbus, IN.
| Data | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,778 | 51,268 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $48,054 | $75,114 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- The population in Columbus is higher at 51,268, compared to 35,778 in Texarkana.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 35.8 years in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $75,114, compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- In Columbus, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Columbus.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 39 | 2 |
| White | 46 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 39% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbus at 71% compared to 46% in Texarkana.
- In Columbus, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 2% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Texarkana and Columbus at 9%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbus at 5%, compared to 4% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Texarkana and Columbus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.6% in Columbus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbus at 24.1% versus 23.4% in Texarkana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 21.5% compared to 16.3% in Columbus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 16.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 42.0% compared to 36.7% in Columbus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbus at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (324) | 0.8% (398) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (6,286) | 14.3% (7,340) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (4,243) | 9.1% (4,677) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (5,688) | 28.1% (14,382) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 14.3% in Columbus.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 9.1% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 15.9% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.