Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Union city, GA.
Data | Texarkana | Union city |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,306 | 27,895 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $45,233 | $46,696 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Union city
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 29,306, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Union city has a higher median income of $46,696, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Texarkana at 30.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 15% in Texarkana.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.4% in Texarkana.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Texarkana | Union city |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 85 |
White | 56 | 6 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 35% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 6% in Union city.
- Both Texarkana and Union city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Texarkana and Union city at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 4%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Texarkana at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Texarkana | Union city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.2% |
Depression | 24.7% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 24.4% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Union city
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 18.0% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Texarkana at 14.0% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Texarkana | Union city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.5% (129) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 13.2% (3,681) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 7.8% (2,166) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.