Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Texarkana Sterling heights
Population 29,306 132,567
Median Age 39.1 years 41.2 years
Median Income $45,233 $75,381
Married Families 30.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 15% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 4.7

Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 29,306 in Texarkana.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 39.1 years in Texarkana.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
  • Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.4% in Texarkana.

Demographics

Demographics Texarkana vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Texarkana Sterling heights
Black 35 6
White 56 79
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Sterling heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Texarkana.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Texarkana at 5% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling heights at 4%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Texarkana at 1% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Texarkana Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 20.5% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.3% 11.4%
Depression 24.7% 25.5%
Smoking 24.4% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 14.0% 17.7%
Obesity 39.5% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Sterling heights

  • More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 24.7% in Texarkana.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Texarkana Sterling heights
No Schooling 1.5% (440) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 21.6% (6,319) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 14.4% (4,229) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (3,247) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.5% in Texarkana.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.