Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Roberts, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Roberts, MT.
Data | Texarkana | Roberts |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,306 | 281 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $45,233 | $76,688 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Roberts
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 29,306, compared to 281 in Roberts.
- The median age in Roberts is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 39.1 years in Texarkana.
- Roberts has a higher median income of $76,688, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- In Roberts, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Roberts.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Roberts.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Roberts provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Texarkana | Roberts |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | Data is updating |
White | 56 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Roberts
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roberts at 92% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- Both Texarkana and Roberts have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Texarkana at 5% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roberts at 8%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Texarkana at 1% compared to 0% in Roberts.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Texarkana | Roberts |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 9.2% |
Depression | 24.7% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 24.4% | 13.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 23.3% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 29.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Roberts
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 23.0% in Roberts.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 13.9% in Roberts.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Texarkana | Roberts |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 12.8% (36) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 15.7% (44) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 19.9% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Roberts
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 12.8% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roberts at 15.7%, compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
- In Roberts, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.