Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Milford, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Milford, UT.
| Data | Texarkana | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,306 | 1,454 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,233 | $83,783 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Milford
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 29,306, compared to 1,454 in Milford.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 24.8 years in Milford.
- Milford has a higher median income of $83,783, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- In Milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Milford.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Milford.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | Data is updating |
| White | 56 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Milford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 0% in Milford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milford at 74% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- Both Texarkana and Milford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Milford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Milford at 6%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Texarkana and Milford at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Milford
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.2% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 23.5% in Milford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 12.4% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Texarkana at 14.0% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 34.2% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.3% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 14.7% (214) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 3.1% (45) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 16.8% (244) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 14.7% in Milford.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 3.1% in Milford.
- In Milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.