Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Gilford, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Gilford, NH.
| Data | Texarkana | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,306 | 7,194 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $45,233 | $75,964 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 0.6% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Gilford
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 29,306, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
- The median age in Gilford is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 39.1 years in Texarkana.
- Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Texarkana at 30.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Gilford.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 4.4%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 0.5 |
| White | 56 | 96.2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 0.7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1.6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1.0 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- In Gilford, the Asian population stands at 0.7%, greater than 0% in Texarkana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Texarkana at 5% compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Texarkana at 3% compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Texarkana at 1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Gilford
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Texarkana at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.