Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Texarkana | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,306 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,233 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 29,306 in Texarkana.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.4% in Texarkana.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 8 |
| White | 56 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Fontana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- Texarkana has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Texarkana.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 5% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Texarkana and Fontana at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Fontana
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fontana at 15.1% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.5% in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
- In Fontana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.