Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Columbus, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Columbus, IN.
| Data | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,306 | 51,268 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,233 | $75,114 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- The population in Columbus is higher at 51,268, compared to 29,306 in Texarkana.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 35.8 years in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $75,114, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- In Columbus, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Columbus.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 2 |
| White | 56 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 13 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbus at 71% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- In Columbus, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 0% in Texarkana.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbus at 5%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Texarkana at 1% compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 15.6% in Columbus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 24.1% in Columbus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 16.3% in Columbus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 36.7% in Columbus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Texarkana at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.8% (398) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 14.3% (7,340) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 9.1% (4,677) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 28.1% (14,382) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 14.3% in Columbus.
- More residents in Texarkana have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 9.1% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.