Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Charlotte, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Charlotte, TN.
| Data | Texarkana | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,306 | 1,674 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,233 | $57,188 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Charlotte
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 29,306, compared to 1,674 in Charlotte.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 36.8 years in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher median income of $57,188, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- In Charlotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Charlotte.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.3% in Charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 6 |
| White | 56 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Charlotte
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlotte at 82% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- Both Texarkana and Charlotte have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Texarkana at 5% compared to 4% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Charlotte at 6%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- In Charlotte, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Texarkana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Charlotte
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 20.3% in Charlotte.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charlotte at 28.8% versus 24.7% in Texarkana.
- Charlotte has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 24.4% in Texarkana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Charlotte at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 38.9% in Charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 18.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.4% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 25.3% (424) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 26.0% (436) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 9.9% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Charlotte
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Charlotte.
- In Charlotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 21.6% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlotte at 26.0%, compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 9.9% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.