Demographics details for Texarkana, AR vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Texarkana, AR vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Texarkana | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,306 | 466 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,233 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Texarkana vs Ash fork
- In Texarkana, the population is higher at 29,306, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Texarkana have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $45,233 in Texarkana.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- Texarkana has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- The unemployment rate in Texarkana is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Texarkana vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Texarkana | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | Data is updating |
| White | 56 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Texarkana vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Texarkana at 35% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- Both Texarkana and Ash fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ash fork at 15%, compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Texarkana at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Texarkana | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Texarkana vs Ash fork
- More residents in Texarkana report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.7% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Texarkana at 24.4% compared to 19.3% in Ash fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Texarkana at 39.5% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Texarkana | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (440) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (6,319) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (4,229) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (3,247) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Texarkana vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Texarkana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.