Demographics details for Tewksbury, MA vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tewksbury, MA vs Rialto, CA.
Data | Tewksbury | Rialto |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,388 | 103,545 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 31.2 years |
Median Income | $111,000 | $80,750 |
Married Families | 0.56% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Tewksbury vs Rialto
- The population in Rialto is higher at 103,545, compared to 31,388 in Tewksbury.
- Residents in Tewksbury have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Tewksbury has a higher median income of $111,000 compared to $80,750 in Rialto.
- In Rialto, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 0.56% in Tewksbury.
- The poverty level is higher in Rialto at 18%, compared to 0% in Tewksbury.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.6% in Tewksbury.
Demographics
Demographics Tewksbury vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tewksbury | Rialto |
---|---|---|
Black | 2.5 | 12 |
White | 85 | -7 |
Asian | 6.5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 75 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 17 |
American Indian | 0.5 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Tewksbury vs Rialto
- In Rialto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2.5% in Tewksbury.
- Tewksbury has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Tewksbury at 6.5% compared to 2% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 3% in Tewksbury.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 3% in Tewksbury.
- In Rialto, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0.5% in Tewksbury.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tewksbury | Rialto |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.7% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.8% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tewksbury vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rialto at 17.5% versus 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- Rialto has a higher smoking rate at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rialto at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- Rialto has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rialto at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tewksbury | Rialto |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (2,754) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 18.6% (19,301) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 30.0% (31,028) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tewksbury vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- In Rialto, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
- In Rialto, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.5% compared to 0.0% in Tewksbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.