Demographics details for Temecula, CA vs Fountain hills, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Temecula, CA vs Fountain hills, AZ.

Data Temecula Fountain hills
Population 111,752 23,785
Median Age 36.2 years 60.2 years
Median Income $111,881 $100,317
Married Families 43.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.4 3.2

Population Comparison: Temecula vs Fountain hills

  • In Temecula, the population is higher at 111,752, compared to 23,785 in Fountain hills.
  • The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 36.2 years in Temecula.
  • Temecula has a higher median income of $111,881 compared to $100,317 in Fountain hills.
  • In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 43.0% in Temecula.
  • Temecula has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Temecula is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.

Demographics

Demographics Temecula vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Temecula Fountain hills
Black 4 2
White 42 89
Asian 11 2
Hispanic 28 3
Two or More Races 14 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Temecula vs Fountain hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Temecula at 4% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain hills at 89% compared to 42% in Temecula.
  • The Asian population is larger in Temecula at 11% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Temecula at 28% compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Temecula at 14% compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Temecula at 1% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Temecula Fountain hills
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.2% 8.0%
Depression 17.1% 19.7%
Smoking 10.7% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 19.8%
Obesity 31.7% 26.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Temecula vs Fountain hills

  • In Fountain hills, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Temecula.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain hills at 19.7% versus 17.1% in Temecula.
  • Smoking rates are the same in both Temecula and Fountain hills at 10.7%.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 17.8% in Temecula.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Temecula at 31.7% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fountain hills at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Temecula.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Temecula Fountain hills
No Schooling 1.0% (1,122) 0.4% (88)
High School Diploma 10.5% (11,734) 11.7% (2,782)
Less than High School 7.8% (8,699) 3.7% (876)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.3% (27,134) 42.2% (10,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Temecula vs Fountain hills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Temecula have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
  • In Fountain hills, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.7% compared to 10.5% in Temecula.
  • More residents in Temecula have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
  • In Fountain hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 24.3% in Temecula.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.