Demographics details for Temecula, CA vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Temecula, CA vs Central point, OR.
Data | Temecula | Central point |
---|---|---|
Population | 111,752 | 19,222 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $111,881 | $79,731 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Temecula vs Central point
- In Temecula, the population is higher at 111,752, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 36.2 years in Temecula.
- Temecula has a higher median income of $111,881 compared to $79,731 in Central point.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Temecula.
- The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 9% in Temecula.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.4% in Temecula.
Demographics
Demographics Temecula vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Temecula | Central point |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 42 | 76 |
Asian | 11 | 1 |
Hispanic | 28 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Temecula vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Temecula at 4% compared to 0% in Central point.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 42% in Temecula.
- The Asian population is larger in Temecula at 11% compared to 1% in Central point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Temecula at 28% compared to 15% in Central point.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Temecula at 14% compared to 7% in Central point.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Temecula and Central point at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Temecula | Central point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.0% |
Depression | 17.1% | 29.4% |
Smoking | 10.7% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Temecula vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in Temecula.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 17.1% in Temecula.
- Central point has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 10.7% in Temecula.
- Binge drinking is more common in Temecula at 17.8% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Obesity rates are higher in Temecula at 31.7% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central point at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Temecula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Temecula | Central point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (1,122) | 1.7% (319) |
High School Diploma | 10.5% (11,734) | 16.1% (3,095) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (8,699) | 13.2% (2,530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.3% (27,134) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Temecula vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.0% in Temecula.
- In Central point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 10.5% in Temecula.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 7.8% in Temecula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Temecula hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.3% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.