Demographics details for Tehachapi, CA vs Winslow, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tehachapi, CA vs Winslow, AR.
| Data | Tehachapi | Winslow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,389 | 362 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $62,788 | $43,036 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Tehachapi vs Winslow
- In Tehachapi, the population is higher at 12,389, compared to 362 in Winslow.
- The median age in Winslow is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 38.3 years in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher median income of $62,788 compared to $43,036 in Winslow.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Tehachapi and Winslow at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Winslow at 15%, compared to 11% in Tehachapi.
- The unemployment rate in Tehachapi is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.5% in Winslow.
Demographics
Demographics Tehachapi vs Winslow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tehachapi | Winslow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 37 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 4 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Tehachapi vs Winslow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tehachapi at 7% compared to 0% in Winslow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Winslow at 87% compared to 37% in Tehachapi.
- In Winslow, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Tehachapi.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tehachapi at 37% compared to 1% in Winslow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tehachapi at 12% compared to 4% in Winslow.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tehachapi at 4% compared to 2% in Winslow.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tehachapi | Winslow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tehachapi vs Winslow
- In Winslow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.0% in Tehachapi.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Winslow at 26.2% versus 17.6% in Tehachapi.
- Winslow has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Tehachapi.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tehachapi at 18.7% compared to 16.5% in Winslow.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tehachapi at 35.2% compared to 32.3% in Winslow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winslow at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Tehachapi.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tehachapi | Winslow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (172) | 0.3% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,649) | 23.2% (84) |
| Less than High School | 27.7% (3,437) | 18.2% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (1,354) | 9.9% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tehachapi vs Winslow
- A higher percentage of residents in Tehachapi have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Winslow.
- In Winslow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 13.3% in Tehachapi.
- More residents in Tehachapi have less than a high school education at 27.7% compared to 18.2% in Winslow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tehachapi hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.9% in Winslow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.