Demographics details for Taylorville, IL vs Spring park, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorville, IL vs Spring park, MN.
| Data | Taylorville | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,312 | 1,663 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 55.5 years |
| Median Income | $49,471 | $48,684 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Taylorville vs Spring park
- In Taylorville, the population is higher at 10,312, compared to 1,663 in Spring park.
- The median age in Spring park is higher at 55.5 years, compared to 38.2 years in Taylorville.
- Taylorville has a higher median income of $49,471 compared to $48,684 in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorville at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
- Taylorville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Spring park.
- The unemployment rate in Taylorville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Spring park.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorville vs Spring park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorville | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 9 |
| White | 91 | 82 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorville vs Spring park
- In Spring park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Taylorville.
- Taylorville has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 82% in Spring park.
- Both Taylorville and Spring park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Spring park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Taylorville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spring park at 3%, compared to 1% in Taylorville.
- In Spring park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Taylorville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorville | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 22.5% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorville vs Spring park
- More residents in Taylorville report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.4% in Spring park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spring park at 23.7% versus 22.9% in Taylorville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorville at 20.7% compared to 11.7% in Spring park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 17.2% in Taylorville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorville at 39.7% compared to 26.0% in Spring park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring park at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Taylorville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorville | Spring park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (63) | 0.5% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 28.5% (2,938) | 27.8% (463) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (938) | 12.0% (200) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (1,406) | 29.1% (484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorville vs Spring park
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Spring park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorville hold a high school diploma at 28.5% compared to 27.8% in Spring park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring park at 12.0%, compared to 9.1% in Taylorville.
- In Spring park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.1% compared to 13.6% in Taylorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.