Demographics details for Taylorville, IL vs Pratt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorville, IL vs Pratt, KS.
| Data | Taylorville | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,312 | 9,067 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $49,471 | $61,685 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Taylorville vs Pratt
- In Taylorville, the population is higher at 10,312, compared to 9,067 in Pratt.
- Residents in Taylorville have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685, compared to $49,471 in Taylorville.
- In Pratt, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Taylorville.
- The poverty level is higher in Pratt at 12%, compared to 10% in Taylorville.
- The unemployment rate in Taylorville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorville vs Pratt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorville | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 2 |
| White | 91 | 83 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorville vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylorville at 6% compared to 2% in Pratt.
- Taylorville has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 83% in Pratt.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorville at 2% compared to 0% in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Taylorville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pratt at 6%, compared to 1% in Taylorville.
- In Pratt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Taylorville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorville | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorville vs Pratt
- More residents in Taylorville report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorville at 22.9% compared to 19.7% in Pratt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorville at 20.7% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in Taylorville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorville at 39.7% compared to 39.4% in Pratt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorville at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Pratt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorville | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (63) | 0.2% (22) |
| High School Diploma | 28.5% (2,938) | 15.0% (1,362) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (938) | 10.3% (936) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (1,406) | 18.0% (1,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorville vs Pratt
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorville hold a high school diploma at 28.5% compared to 15.0% in Pratt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pratt at 10.3%, compared to 9.1% in Taylorville.
- In Pratt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 13.6% in Taylorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.