Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Torrance, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Torrance, CA.
Data | Taylorsville | Torrance |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,879 | 141,126 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 42.9 years |
Median Income | $81,417 | $109,554 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Torrance
- The population in Torrance is higher at 141,126, compared to 57,879 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Torrance is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Torrance has a higher median income of $109,554, compared to $81,417 in Taylorsville.
- In Torrance, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Torrance.
- Torrance has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Torrance provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Torrance |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 57 | 25 |
Asian | 7 | 39 |
Hispanic | 25 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Torrance
- In Torrance, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 25% in Torrance.
- In Torrance, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 7% in Taylorsville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 20% in Torrance.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Torrance at 12%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Torrance at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Torrance |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 8.0% |
Depression | 27.2% | 14.0% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 7.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 32.0% | 21.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Torrance
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 12.7% in Torrance.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 14.0% in Torrance.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 10.0% compared to 7.9% in Torrance.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Torrance.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 32.0% compared to 21.4% in Torrance.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Torrance.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Torrance |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 1.1% (1,535) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 11.4% (16,056) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 5.9% (8,337) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 39.6% (55,843) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Torrance
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Torrance.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.4% in Torrance.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 5.9% in Torrance.
- In Torrance, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.