Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Richfield, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Richfield, PA.

Data Taylorsville Richfield
Population 57,879 549
Median Age 33.7 years 40.0 years
Median Income $81,417 $60,000
Married Families 40.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Richfield

  • In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 549 in Richfield.
  • The median age in Richfield is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
  • Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $60,000 in Richfield.
  • In Richfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Richfield at 10%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Richfield.

Demographics

Demographics Taylorsville vs Richfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Taylorsville Richfield
Black 1 1
White 57 98
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 25 1
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Richfield

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Richfield at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Richfield at 98% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 0% in Richfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 1% in Richfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 0% in Richfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Richfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Taylorsville Richfield
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% Data is updating%
Depression 27.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 10.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 32.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 12.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Richfield

  • More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Taylorsville Richfield
No Schooling 1.2% (721) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.9% (9,799) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 15.2% (8,775) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (9,066) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Richfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Richfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.