Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Taylorsville Powder springs
Population 57,879 17,337
Median Age 33.7 years 38.7 years
Median Income $81,417 $88,311
Married Families 40.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Powder springs

  • In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311, compared to $81,417 in Taylorsville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Powder springs at 12%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Taylorsville vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Taylorsville Powder springs
Black 1 51
White 57 22
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 25 19
Two or More Races 9 5
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
  • Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 19% in Powder springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Powder springs at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Taylorsville Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 10.7%
Depression 27.2% 17.7%
Smoking 10.0% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 14.4%
Obesity 32.0% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Powder springs

  • More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Taylorsville Powder springs
No Schooling 1.2% (721) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 16.9% (9,799) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 15.2% (8,775) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (9,066) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.