Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Norman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Norman, OK.
| Data | Taylorsville | Norman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 129,627 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $62,849 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Norman
- The population in Norman is higher at 129,627, compared to 57,879 in Taylorsville.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 31.0 years in Norman.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $62,849 in Norman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Norman.
- The poverty level is higher in Norman at 12%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Norman.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Norman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Norman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 57 | 67 |
| Asian | 7 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Norman
- In Norman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norman at 67% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 5% in Norman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 8% in Norman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norman at 11%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- In Norman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Norman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Norman
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Norman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 25.6% in Norman.
- Norman has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norman at 15.5% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Norman has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norman at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Norman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.3% (396) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 9.4% (12,171) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 6.3% (8,174) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 26.3% (34,072) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Norman
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Norman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 9.4% in Norman.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 6.3% in Norman.
- In Norman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.