Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Merrimac, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Merrimac, WI.
Data | Taylorsville | Merrimac |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,879 | 526 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 38.0 years |
Median Income | $81,417 | $86,250 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Merrimac
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 526 in Merrimac.
- The median age in Merrimac is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Merrimac has a higher median income of $86,250, compared to $81,417 in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Merrimac.
- Taylorsville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Merrimac.
- The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Merrimac.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Merrimac provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Merrimac |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 4 |
White | 57 | 84 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Merrimac
- In Merrimac, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Merrimac at 84% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 0% in Merrimac.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 8% in Merrimac.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 4% in Merrimac.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Merrimac.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Merrimac |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 9.6% |
Depression | 27.2% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 24.0% |
Obesity | 32.0% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Merrimac
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.8% in Merrimac.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 23.6% in Merrimac.
- Merrimac has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Merrimac at 24.0% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Merrimac has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Merrimac at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Merrimac |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 20.2% (106) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 22.8% (120) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 21.1% (111) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Merrimac
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Merrimac.
- In Merrimac, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Merrimac at 22.8%, compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Merrimac, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.