Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Hobbs, NM.
| Data | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 39,648 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $63,804 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 39,648 in Hobbs.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $63,804 in Hobbs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Hobbs.
- The poverty level is higher in Hobbs at 15%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Hobbs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 57 | 4 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 25 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 1% in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 25% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Hobbs at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Hobbs has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 2.2% (856) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 15.9% (6,312) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 26.2% (10,381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.