Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Grand saline, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Grand saline, TX.

Data Taylorsville Grand saline
Population 57,879 3,219
Median Age 33.7 years 42.6 years
Median Income $81,417 $37,823
Married Families 40.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 9% 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Grand saline

  • In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 3,219 in Grand saline.
  • The median age in Grand saline is higher at 42.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
  • Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $37,823 in Grand saline.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 33.0% in Grand saline.
  • The poverty level is higher in Grand saline at 16%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Grand saline.

Demographics

Demographics Taylorsville vs Grand saline provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Taylorsville Grand saline
Black 1 1
White 57 56
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 25 31
Two or More Races 9 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Grand saline

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Grand saline at 1%.
  • Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 56% in Grand saline.
  • The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 0% in Grand saline.
  • Grand saline has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 31%, compared to 25% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand saline at 11%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Grand saline at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Taylorsville Grand saline
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 22.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 16.9%
Depression 27.2% 27.9%
Smoking 10.0% 26.7%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 16.7%
Obesity 32.0% 40.2%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Grand saline

  • In Grand saline, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 18.8% in Taylorsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand saline at 27.9% versus 27.2% in Taylorsville.
  • Grand saline has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand saline at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
  • Grand saline has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand saline at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Taylorsville Grand saline
No Schooling 1.2% (721) 2.9% (94)
High School Diploma 16.9% (9,799) 17.6% (568)
Less than High School 15.2% (8,775) 44.1% (1,421)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (9,066) 6.6% (213)

Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Grand saline

  • In Grand saline, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
  • In Grand saline, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand saline at 44.1%, compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 6.6% in Grand saline.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.