Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Ferndale, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Ferndale, WA.
| Data | Taylorsville | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 15,840 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $82,466 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Ferndale
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 15,840 in Ferndale.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 32.9 years in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $82,466, compared to $81,417 in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Ferndale.
- Taylorsville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Ferndale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 57 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Ferndale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ferndale at 71% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- Both Taylorsville and Ferndale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 7%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 13% in Ferndale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 7% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 25.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Ferndale
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.4% in Ferndale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ferndale at 29.9% versus 27.2% in Taylorsville.
- Ferndale has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ferndale at 18.1% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 32.0% compared to 25.3% in Ferndale.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Taylorsville and Ferndale at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 1.2% (186) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 11.5% (1,827) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 6.2% (979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 20.5% (3,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Ferndale
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Taylorsville and Ferndale at 1.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.5% in Ferndale.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 6.2% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.