Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Epsom, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Epsom, NH.
Data | Taylorsville | Epsom |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,879 | 4,756 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $81,417 | $71,000 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 1.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Epsom
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 4,756 in Epsom.
- The median age in Epsom is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $71,000 in Epsom.
- In Epsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Epsom.
- The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 1.9% in Epsom.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Epsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Epsom |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 57 | 98 |
Asian | 7 | 1 |
Hispanic | 25 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Epsom
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Epsom at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Epsom at 98% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 1% in Epsom.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 0% in Epsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 0% in Epsom.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Epsom.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Epsom |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 27.2% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 32.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Epsom
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Epsom |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Epsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.