Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Cochranville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Cochranville, PA.
| Data | Taylorsville | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 488 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 49.6 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $92,292 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cochranville
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- The median age in Cochranville is higher at 49.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292, compared to $81,417 in Taylorsville.
- In Cochranville, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- Cochranville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Cochranville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 57 | 90 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochranville at 90% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 6% in Cochranville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 4% in Cochranville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cochranville
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Cochranville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 24.1% in Cochranville.
- Cochranville has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Cochranville has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 24.4% (119) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 15.6% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 13.7% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochranville at 15.6%, compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 13.7% in Cochranville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.