Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Aberdeen, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Aberdeen, MD.
| Data | Taylorsville | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 16,859 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $74,555 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Aberdeen
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 16,859 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Aberdeen is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $74,555 in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Aberdeen.
- The poverty level is higher in Aberdeen at 12%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Aberdeen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 24 |
| White | 57 | 52 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 52% in Aberdeen.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 4% in Aberdeen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 11% in Aberdeen.
- Both Taylorsville and Aberdeen have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Aberdeen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Aberdeen
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Aberdeen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 22.2% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 14.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aberdeen at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.6% (94) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 15.2% (2,565) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 13.9% (2,349) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 18.1% (3,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Aberdeen
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Aberdeen.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 13.9% in Aberdeen.
- In Aberdeen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.