Demographics details for Taylorsville, NC vs Union city, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, NC vs Union city, PA.

Data Taylorsville Union city
Population 2,298 2,887
Median Age 53.7 years 46.6 years
Median Income $43,681 $41,764
Married Families 30.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city

  • The population in Union city is higher at 2,887, compared to 2,298 in Taylorsville.
  • Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 46.6 years in Union city.
  • Taylorsville has a higher median income of $43,681 compared to $41,764 in Union city.
  • In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Taylorsville and Union city at 12%.
  • Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Taylorsville.

Demographics

Demographics Taylorsville vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Taylorsville Union city
Black 8 Data is updating
White 86 91
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Taylorsville at 8% compared to 0% in Union city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Union city at 91% compared to 86% in Taylorsville.
  • Both Taylorsville and Union city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 5%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Union city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Taylorsville Union city
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 19.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 14.5%
Depression 25.6% 24.6%
Smoking 21.5% 25.3%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 17.8%
Obesity 37.8% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city

  • In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.6% in Taylorsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 25.6% compared to 24.6% in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 21.5% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Union city at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
  • Union city has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 37.8% in Taylorsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Taylorsville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Taylorsville Union city
No Schooling 1.2% (27) 0.3% (9)
High School Diploma 26.1% (599) 42.5% (1,226)
Less than High School 19.3% (444) 16.5% (476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (252) 8.2% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Union city.
  • In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.5% compared to 26.1% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 16.5% in Union city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 8.2% in Union city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.