Demographics details for Taylorsville, NC vs Monroe city, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, NC vs Monroe city, MO.

Data Taylorsville Monroe city
Population 2,298 2,650
Median Age 53.7 years 40.1 years
Median Income $43,681 $50,885
Married Families 30.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Monroe city

  • The population in Monroe city is higher at 2,650, compared to 2,298 in Taylorsville.
  • Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 40.1 years in Monroe city.
  • Monroe city has a higher median income of $50,885, compared to $43,681 in Taylorsville.
  • In Monroe city, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Monroe city at 13%, compared to 12% in Taylorsville.
  • The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Monroe city.

Demographics

Demographics Taylorsville vs Monroe city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Taylorsville Monroe city
Black 8 11
White 86 79
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 3 1
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Monroe city

  • In Monroe city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 8% in Taylorsville.
  • Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 79% in Monroe city.
  • In Monroe city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Taylorsville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 3% compared to 1% in Monroe city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Monroe city at 5%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
  • In Monroe city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Taylorsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Taylorsville Monroe city
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 13.1%
Depression 25.6% 25.7%
Smoking 21.5% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 17.7%
Obesity 37.8% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Monroe city

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Taylorsville and Monroe city at 18.6%.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe city at 25.7% versus 25.6% in Taylorsville.
  • Monroe city has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 21.5% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe city at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
  • Monroe city has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 37.8% in Taylorsville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe city at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Taylorsville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Taylorsville Monroe city
No Schooling 1.2% (27) 0.5% (13)
High School Diploma 26.1% (599) 33.2% (880)
Less than High School 19.3% (444) 20.6% (545)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (252) 12.2% (323)

Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Monroe city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Monroe city.
  • In Monroe city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.2% compared to 26.1% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Monroe city at 20.6%, compared to 19.3% in Taylorsville.
  • In Monroe city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 11.0% in Taylorsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.