Demographics details for Taylorsville, NC vs Midland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, NC vs Midland, TX.
Data | Taylorsville | Midland |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,298 | 134,444 |
Median Age | 53.7 years | 31.4 years |
Median Income | $43,681 | $90,448 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Midland
- The population in Midland is higher at 134,444, compared to 2,298 in Taylorsville.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 31.4 years in Midland.
- Midland has a higher median income of $90,448, compared to $43,681 in Taylorsville.
- In Midland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 30.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Taylorsville and Midland at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Taylorsville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.9% in Midland.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Midland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Taylorsville | Midland |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 8 |
White | 86 | 29 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 45 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Midland
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Midland at 8%.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 29% in Midland.
- In Midland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Taylorsville.
- Midland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Midland at 15%, compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
- In Midland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Taylorsville | Midland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 11.1% |
Depression | 25.6% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Midland
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.1% in Midland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 25.6% compared to 21.4% in Midland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 21.5% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Midland at 18.6% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Taylorsville at 37.8% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Taylorsville | Midland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (27) | 2.8% (3,705) |
High School Diploma | 26.1% (599) | 10.2% (13,724) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (444) | 17.6% (23,705) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (252) | 19.5% (26,213) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Midland
- In Midland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Midland.
- In Midland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 11.0% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.